Financial Times (December 13)
“France is in a similar situation to Italy. Both are attempting structural reform while fighting the threat of recession and asking the EU—which is to say Berlin—for more leeway on fiscal policy.” The reforms will help to remove “the bureaucratic sclerosis that chokes off innovation and growth.”
Tags: Berlin, Bureaucracy, EU, Fiscal policy, France, Growth, Innovation, Italy, Recession, Structural reform, Threat
South China Morning Post (December 1)
Moody’s downgraded Japan’s credit rating by one notch from Aa3 for to A1. “Despite the rating cut, Moody’s noted that Japan was not in a disastrous situation.” The Post explains that “Japan, which once led the world in innovation, is facing stiff competition from emerging nations including China, while a falling number of working-age people is shrinking its tax base even as soaring ranks of seniors strain the public purse.”
Tags: China, Competition, Credit rating, Downgrade, Emerging nations, Innovation, Japan, Moody's, Seniors, Tax base
Wall Street Journal (December 23, 2013)
To avoid the stagnation that has afflicted Japan, the U.S. should embrace immigration reform. Reform could lead to a younger population, innovation and entrepreneurship. “If Japan, a rapidly aging country with famously prohibitive immigration laws, teaches us anything, it is this: If you want to avoid a “lost decade,” open your doors to immigrants.”
Tags: Aging, Entrepreneurship, Immigrants, Immigration, Innovation, Japan, Laws, Lost decade, Population, Reform, Stagnation, U.S.
Washington Post (December 5, 2013)
The U.S. does not test well. In contrast, Japan, Shanghai, Singapore, Hong Kong, and Taiwan swept top places for math, reading and science in the recent PISA global educational survey. Nevertheless, “the United States has done very well in harnessing the talents of its top 1 percent and in attracting the top 1 percent from the rest of the world to live and work here. These are the engines of innovation, growth and dynamism.” Whether they will keep the U.S. from falling behind, however, remains to be seen.
Tags: Dynamism, Education, Growth, Hong Kong, Innovation, Japan, Math, Reading, Science, Shanghai, Singapore, Taiwan, Talent, U.S.
Wall Street Journal (August 7)
“The most striking fact about the recently announced sale of the Boston Globe and Washington Post is their low prices…. The prices reflect the decline of newspapers as a business in the Internet age, which is the kind of creative destruction millions of Americans have experienced. Disruption is the price a capitalist economy pays for innovation, and the news business is merely the latest example.” The new owners should be welcomed as they provide “an opportunity for new ideas and perhaps a turnaround.”
Tags: Boston Globe, Capitalism, Creative destruction, Decline, Disruption, Ideas, Innovation, Internet, Newspapers, Opportunity, Owners, Prices, Turnaround, Washington Post
MIT Technology Review (June 5)
Of late, companies have been embracing open innovation contests to pull off low-cost breakthroughs. This approach can succeed. “Open competitions can help find an optimal solution to a well-understood problem,” but typically these contests fail to deliver true innovation for a well-known reason. “Real innovation is always the outcome of ongoing discourse among a small group of innovators who truly understand the importance of what they’re working on. No matter where we look, from the American Revolution to the digital revolution, it’s always a small group of obsessed individuals who know and talk to each other that are responsible for big innovations. As John Stuart Mill observed: ‘Persons of genius, it is true, are, and are always likely to be, a small minority.’”
Tags: Breakthroughs, Genius, Innovation, Innovators, John Stuart Mill, Low-cost, Minority, Open contests, Problems, Solutions
Los Angeles Times (May 9)
“Perhaps the only silver lining to the Great Recession is that it triggered a new focus on manufacturing in the United States. After 25 years of being sold a shiny vision of a service-dominated post-industrial economy, the U.S. is rediscovering how important it is to actually make things in order to spur innovation, raise wages, drive exports and lower the trade deficit.”
Tags: Exports, Great Recession, Innovation, Manufacturing, U.S., Wages
Economist (January 14, 2012)
Founded in 1880, “Kodak was the Google of its day,” with innovative marketing and pioneering technology. But Kodak quit changing. Profits peaked at $2.5 billion in 1999. With 9 quarterly losses in the past 3 years, Kodak’s share price has fallen by 90% in just the past year. In contrast, “Fujifilm has mastered new tactics and survived. Film went from 60% of its profits in 2000 to basically nothing, yet it found new sources of revenue.” In contrast, Kodak “is poised, like an old photo, to fade away.”
Tags: Fujifilm, Innovation, Kodak, Marketing, Profits, Technology
The Economist (May 5)
The U.S. Patent Office issued 244,358 patents in 2010. That’s the good news. The bad news is that there is a back log of over 700,000 applications. “On average, hopeful inventors wait for two years until their applications are even considered. Ten months more may go by before they learn whether they have been successful.” As Congress has further cut spending, the backlog is expected to worsen. The Economist believes the wait stymies innovation. “While they wait for a decision, the American economy is losing out.”
The U.S. Patent Office issued 244,358 patents in 2010. That’s the good news. The bad news is that there is a back log of over 700,000 applications. “On average, hopeful inventors wait for two years until their applications are even considered. Ten months more may go by before they learn whether they have been successful.” As Congress has further cut spending, the backlog is expected to worsen. The Economist believes the wait stymies innovation. “While they wait for a decision, the American economy is losing out.”
Tags: Congress, Economy, Innovation, Patents, U.S.
Institutional Investor (October)
U.S. companies are playing it safe and wasting “growth opportunities in an innovation-hungry international marketplace.” They should be investing in new technologies and growth. The impact will be felt across the economy. “Risk aversion is squandering what could be the last great opportunity for a U.S. innovation revolution – an era that could build shareholder value and insulate us from future financial crises.”
Tags: Growth, Innovation, Risk aversion, Shareholder value
