The New Yorker (January 23)
For the 53 Republican senators, “membership in Trump’s party” is an “all-embracing and restrictive proposition.” Unlike royal membership, Trump’s team “tars reputations rather than enhances them.” Trump “never admits anything, demands total loyalty, and strikes out at anyone that transgresses these rules. As with the Windsors, you can’t be a half-in Trump Republican.”
Tags: Demands, Loyalty, Membership, Party, Republican, Reputations, Restrictive, Royal, Senators, Tars, Trump
Reuters (December 24)
“A financing drought may crack farmers’ loyalty to Donald Trump. The U.S. president’s trade war has evaporated export markets for a number of crops, leaving growers struggling even more than before.”
Tags: Crops, Drought, Export markets, Farmers, Financing, Growers, Loyalty, Struggling, Trade war, Trump, U.S.
Los Angeles Times (September 25)
“It’s time for you to expel President Trump from the White House.” Republican “party loyalty, if unchecked, could mean the United States finds itself in another war. But this time, we could suffer irreparable harm in the form of a nuclear attack on our soil…. Republicans, now is the time to stand your ground against Trump. Protect our country by starting the process to remove Trump from office.”
Tags: Expel, Loyalty, Nuclear attack, Protect, Remove, Republicans, Trump, U.S., War
Financial Times (September 19)
“There are no examples of lasting currency unions that are not ultimately backed by a political union.” The EU papered over this and other shortcomings in hopes that the economic benefits of monetary integration would lead to popular support. Instead national identities remain “much stronger than any common European loyalty.” This hinders leaders from extending decisive support to solve the eurozone’s problems, making clear “the limits to European solidarity.”
Tags: Currency, EU, euro, Loyalty, Solidarity
